jump to navigation

“Basically, This Word Has Grown Stale.” December 8, 2005

Posted by Leita in Flotsam/Jetsam.
trackback

At some point in time, people–particularly those being interviewed–have joined together to insert the word “basically” into 79% of all opening sentences.

Yes, I did the math.

Two weeks ago, “basically” replaced “ummm” as the most often used filler word on television. No one is immune. From the highest of the educated to the humble bloke swearing the tornado sounded just like a freight train chugging through his mobile home, there exists only a scant few who refrain from the rhythmic maxim. Then again, their own diatribe is usually so bland (think of the professional scholars who spent all of Gran-mama’s money on twenty years of assorted schoolingssszzzzzzzz…) it is difficult to stay awake long enough to really test.

On the bright side, use of the word “disrespect” as a verb (“Don’t your disrespect me, Bobby.”) instead of a transitive verb is finally playing itself out. More over here.

Advertisements

Comments»

1. LaRue - March 7, 2006

The word “basically? is driving me up the wall. I listen to Air America for between 3 to 4 hours most weekdays. I believe in this political thinking and agree with most of their words before and after “basically.? Since I don’t listen to much right wing programing, I ask you- Are those pundits just as big on the word “basically? as the liberal leaning pundits?

Al Franken is very intelligent and I really enjoy him and his show. But he’s driving me crazy with basically this and basically that. Sam Seder will do 7 in the 40 minute (minus news and advertisements) hour. And the guests tend to basically-it-up also.

I saw the NY Times’ Edward Wong on PBS talking about Iraq. I hope he doesn’t write that way. Below is an interview from NewsHour. Sorry in advance to bore you with this.
………………………………
GWEN IFILL: Welcome back, Ed. It seems like there have been weeks now of escalating attacks in Iraq, and today’s was certainly spectacular. The question is: How significant was it?

EDWARD WONG: Hi, Gwen. The attack today was fairly symbolic, and it basically had consequences across the entire country. What you saw was — you saw protesters streaming out into streets in cities all across Iraq, whether it was down in Basra in the South by the Gulf or up in Kirkuk in the North.
“A lot of them were calling for some sort of retaliation. Some of the protests were peaceful, but there were also attacks on dozens of mosques in retaliation. Many of the attacks were on Sunni mosques and various political leaders had to come out and basically call for restraint, call for calm. We saw Grand Ayatollah Ali al-Sistani, the Shiite cleric, come out and say that he wanted a period of mourning but he did not want violent reprisals.
We also saw some other Shiite leaders coming out and saying the same thing. And the top American general here and ambassador also came out to try and conciliate between the different parties. So basically it was a huge deal among all the leaders here, all the politicians, the religious leaders, all of them had to come out and try and calm people down.

GWEN IFILL: You have made reference to the U.S. ambassador to Iraq, Zalmay Khalilzad, who on this program yesterday was talking repeatedly it seemed about the problems of sectarian political division, and now we see what appears to be sectarian violence. Is there generally considered to be a connection?

“EDWARD WONG: The sectarian attacks have been going on for quite sometime now in Iraq. Basically for at least a year or more we’ve had a low level of civil war here, even though many people don’t want to call it a civil war. But everyone on the ground here undoubtedly thinks there is one. So far, we’re not – as far as we can tell – we’re not heading towards a large-scale civil war anytime in the coming days.
But sectarianism – violence related to sectarianism has been here. There have been bombings that have killed 130 people at various mosques and those have been in some ways just as devastating as the attack today. So the fact that there is this sectarian-oriented attack isn’t that new; it’s just that they decided to attack one of the most significant shrines in the world of Shiite Islam.

“GWEN IFILL: In fact, Samarra is one of the four holy cities in Iraq. So when the United States officials on the ground there watched this, did they fear that because of this symbolism it may undermine the political process they’ve been trying to jump-start?

EDWARD WONG: It’s definitely created a lot of tension. And some of the Shiite leaders are even blaming that on the Americans, saying that the Americans haven’t been conciliatory enough in this process, that the Americans have been upping the tension by using the wrong language, by underscoring the divisions, by calling for various quotas, for example, in the government.
So the Americans have been trying to act as a middle person in this process, and now you have these groups that are still far apart in their talks and that are also feeling alienated from the Americans and from each other. So this attack only serves to exacerbate that, and we’re seeing groups, you know, calling for calm today but we’re not seeing them really moving close together yet.

GWEN IFILL: We have over time, talking to you and others about the situation in Iraq, found out – had questions about the role of Muqtada al-Sadr, who has quite a following, and a connection, as well, to Iran. Have we heard any reaction at all from him or his followers?

EDWARD WONG: Well, Muqtada’s officials, his high-ranking officials in his organization came out in a press conference and basically also called for restraint, just like many of the other Shiite leaders did, including Ayatollah Sistani, but in Sadr City what you saw was just some members of Muqtada al-Sadr’s militia driving around with Kalashnikovs, driving around in cars, and there were – was a lot of anger there.
A lot of it was directed at Americans; it was directed at both Sunnis and at terrorists or insurgents, but a lot of them were also blaming the Americans for what had happened and oftentimes you do hear this rhetoric, you do hear this talk at a lot of bomb sites.
And Muqtada’s people have been especially anti-American and he’s never backed down from that stand. So you do have a lot of angry young men out there with guns who are angry at not only Sunni Arabs but also at Americans and at other occupying powers here.

GWEN IFILL: So does that mean anytime something like this happens even if it is clear — fairly clear that it is Iraqis essentially attacking Iraqis that Americans by their very presence there will also come under question or suspicion?

EDWARD WONG: The problem that the Americans face here in Iraq is that basically people on all sides believe that the hand of America is in everything. So, I mean, I think that they see America as a superpower and they know its presence in the world and they know its presence here in the country and so when there’s an attack, when there’s political happenings, whatever you call it, they’ll believe that there is some element of American involvement in it.
The other power that many people are starting to look towards is Iran and you’ll see a lot of talk of people seeing that, you know, Iranian involvement in attacks or in various sectarian killings and that’s something that various political leaders are trying to grapple with right now.

GWEN IFILL: President Talabani called this attack today “a conspiracy against the Iraqi people to spark a war among brothers.” What was he getting at there?

EDWARD WONG: Well, for a long time now we’ve heard talk that there were certain guerrilla cells or terrorist cells who want to start a civil war, basically sparking a sectarian war between Sunnis and Shiites. I mean, the letter that Abu Musab al-Zarqawi, the Jordanian militant, sent to certain leaders basically said that he wanted to spark a sectarian war. And we know that that’s part of the strategy of certain militant Sunni Arabs, as well as other types of insurgents, maybe Iranian-backed insurgents – we’re unsure about that — but there is the strategy to do that and basically Talabani and other leaders are trying to pull people back from that. They’re trying to pull people away from that precipice.

GWEN IFILL: Ed Wong, thank you as always.

EDWARD WONG: Great, thanks a lot, Gwen.

Michael Mullett - October 19, 2010

If i hear the word “basicially” again I WILL SCREAM! I stopped watching tv, except for Turner network television and TV Land. So since I hear this word at least 25 times a day, everyday, i am fed up with it!This word was hardly spoken in earlier days. I have Never said this word even once.

2. Anonymous - June 23, 2007

pill to stop smoking

how to stop smoking new quit smoking drug medicine to help stop smoking

3. Anonymous - June 23, 2007

penis lengthening device

increase penis size without pill
penis pump do they work
what does a penis pump do

4. http://www.squidoo.com/maxoderminfo/ - September 6, 2007

The best enlargement products on the market reviewed and rated by consumer opinion feedback.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: